Internet and chat and adult
His claim that he knew that he was actually talking to undercover police in both cases likely strained the credulity of jurors, who convicted him in the case of "Emily." After hearing testimony from a government evaluator who called Ritter a sexually violent predator, the judge sentenced him late last year to a prison term of 18 months to five and a half years.Fantasy defense succeeds in Queensland Had it not been for his two earlier cases, Ritter's defense might not have been all that far-fetched.After doing his usual thing of masturbating in front of the webcam, Ritter announced he was signing off to take a shower. Unfortunately for Ritter, jurors were told of his two prior arrests in similar cases, for which he was never prosecuted.Not so fast, retorted the officer: "U know ur in a lot of trouble, don't you? In both cases, undercover police had lured him into meetings with fictional teenage girls.For example, he signed off by saying "see ya later alligator," something no self-respecting 21st-century girl would say.Even more tellingly, he accidentally said he ("she") was at the office when "she" was supposed to be home from school, a glaring error that "she" immediately corrected. Criminologist Robyn Lincoln of Bond University and forensic psychologist Ian R.Later, he switched to using a webcam, according to a profile by Matt Bai in the New York Times Magazine. "We can do this 2 ways call me and you can turn yourself in at a latter date or I'll get a warrant for you and come pick you up." Ritter turned himself in.
weapons inspector, was among the most vocal in insisting that the Bush administration fabricated its claims of "weapons of mass destruction" in order to justify the U. Instead, he lost his career and his life gradually unraveled.
Coyle, a Gold Coast practitioner and associate professor of law who testified in the case, decided to conduct a study to test the plausibility of Plumridge's defense. Lincoln and Coyle randomly assigned 46 students as either "deceivers" or "receivers." Each volunteer participant was met off-site and individually led to one of several private study locations, to preclude chance encounters with other participants.